HOW SHOULD WE ACT AS LEADERS IN THE COMMUNITY? A comparison between Nicollo MAchiavelli's theories for leadership and those of the Catholic Church

Nicolo Machiavelli and the Roman Catholic Church hold varying beliefs on what it is to be a leaded in our community. The most pass away out oddment between the two theories for drawship is that the Churchs central man of a draw is what a leader does is what a leader is. This is contradictory to Machiavellian principle which suggests that a leader must(prenominal) memorize to deceive, lie and even act against ones own piety to come upon greatness. His central idea is that a leader who is non direful should practice wickedness to rule effectively. This comparison is the snapper difference between the ideas of the Catholic Church and Nicolo Machiavellis theories. Nicolo Machiavelli lived in Florence, Italy. At the eon which he lived, the country was in policy-making unrest and Italy was not united but was rather a appealingness of city-states. Machiavelli became an central diplomat and was involved in much of governmental manner within Florence. However, when the M edici family came into federal agency, he was tortured and made to exile. go in exile he devoted himself to writing history, policy-making philosophy and plays. Once the centre of all political discussion, Machiavelli was this blatant on the outer and tried everything he could to return to Florence. The Medici family refused him. In Machiavellis time, political big businessman was often gained by violence, and the loss of power often involved the leading political figure losing autonomy or even life. To hold onto power one require a willingness to be brutal. But the mistake Machiavelli made was to post out what the politicians of his day already knew, and that was that power was about nice survival and nothing else. Machiavelli studied powerful figures throughout history.

By doing this he gained insight into what they did to attained power, and was able to apply... Editing necessarily to be better like the paragraph that begins Machiavellis book The Prince has an misunderstanding at the end of first sentence I approximate it needs to include the word be before finesse of war. Overall I beleive you have technical sources and good information. in person I have never hear of this person and was blithe with the knowledge gained. I am not sure that your question(title) is answered in a way that can be understood as an answer. I am not an teacher and it is only an opinion. If you wish to get a full essay, order of magnitude it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to ge t a full essay, visit our page: write my paper