Buck’s Dilemma Essay

Solution 1 Classification with the Statement of Cash Flows pip should give way the borrowing and earnings activeness as a specie flow from financing activities. ASC 230-10-45-14 states that emergence from issuing bonds, mortgages, notes, and from other short- or long-term borrowing are a exchange inflow from financing activities. Similarly, ASC 23010-45-15 states that repayments of amounts borrowed are a cash springtime for financing activities.Solution 2 Gross versus net presentationScenario 1Net presentation is appropriate. commit may classify the activity as a $50 zillion net cash inflow ($ snow million in total draw plays less the $50 million repayment) inwardly the financing activities branch of the statement of cash flows.Bucks activities in Scenario 1 are broadly consistent with the consumements for net presentation under(a) ASC 230-10-45-8 and 45-9. Specific exclusivelyy, the draws and payments on the facility can be considered large in congener to the maxi mum borrowing electrical condenser (Buck actually reached its maximum borrowing capacity before making any repayments). The volume of the transactions is assumed to be large (note, in practice, this determination typically involves sagacity and is dependent upon unmarried facts and circumstances). In addition, the terms of both draws stipulate that all amounts are out-of-pocket on demand therefore, Buck should consider the draws as having sea captain maturities of ternion months or less. ASC 230-10-45-9 only permits net presentation when borrowings wee original maturities of trine months or less.Scenario 2The activity connect to Bucks graduation draw and subsequent repayment should be presented on a down-to-earth basis deep down the financing activities section as a $60 million inflow for the draw on July 15, 2010, and a $60 million outflow for the repayment on declination 15, 2010. The activity related to Bucks seconddraw and subsequent repayment may be presented on a n et basis within the financing activities section. The $40 million draw on September 30, 2010, and the repayment on December 1, 2010, net to zero for annual reporting purposes. Bucks activities related to both of the draws in Scenario 2 once again reflect or so of the characteristics within the cash flow statement guidance.The transactions can be considered large in relation to the maximum borrowing capacity, and the volume of activity is assumed to be large (note, in practice, these determinations typically involve judgment and are dependent upon individual facts and circumstances). Unlike Scenario 1, the terms of the draws do not consider the draws to be due on demand to Bucks bank. Rather, the first draw has an original maturity of six months, and the second draw has an original maturity of trey months or less. Therefore, in accordance with ASC 230-10-45-9, Buck must present the activity related to the first draw on a gross basis because the original maturity is greater than thr ee months. In turn, net presentation is appropriate for the second draw since it has an original maturity of three months or less.Scenario 3Buck should present all borrowing and payment activity under the forwardness on a gross basis within the financing activities section of the statement of cash flows. The draws on the Facility do not have any specialized repayment aliment other than the overall utmost date of the Facility as of December 31, 2012. While the activity does have some of the factors take toconsider net presentation, including large dollar amounts in relation to the maximum borrowing capacity and large volumes of transactions (see notes in Scenarios 1 and 2 above), the draws do not have an original maturities of three months or less. infra the provisions of Scenario 3, the only activities that Buck could potentially present net within its statement of cash flows are transactions occurring on or afterward October 1, 2012. Said differently, only draws occurring wi thin three months of the Facilitys expiration would be considered to have original maturities of three months or less.Solution 3 IFRSsUnder IFRSs, IAS 7 is the primary source of guidance for determining how to present information about the cash flows of an entity within the financial statements. IFRSs and U.S. GAAP are broadly consistent regarding net versus gross presentation. Similar to U.S. GAAP, IFRSs generally require entities to present information about an entitys amounts of cash receipts and cash payments during a period on a gross basis. However, in genuine circumstances, IFRSs permit certain cash flow activities to be presented on a net basis. Paragraph 22(b) of IAS 7 states that cash flows may be report on a net basis when cash receipts and payments for items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are large, and the maturities are short. This guidance is generally consistent with the provisions of ASC 230-1045-8. Further, paragraph 23A of IAS 7 provides the followi ng examples of cash receipts and payments that may be presented net under the criteria set forth in paragraph 22(b)a. atomic number 82 amounts relating to credit card customersb. the purchase and sale of investments andc. other short-term borrowings, for example, those which have a maturity period of three months or less.Accordingly, under IFRSs, an entitys cash inflows and outflows associated with a revolving line of credit may potentially be presented on a net basis within the financing activities section of the statement of cash flows, provided the aforementioned criteria are met. Therefore, the conclusions under IFRSs for each scenario in this case would be consistent with that reached under U.S. GAAP.