Essay --

Webster defines feminist movement as both the theory of the political, economic, and social comparability of the sexes and organized activity on the behalf of womens rights and interests (Webster 418). Equality of the sexes (in terms of rights) and the furthering of womens rights argon plainly positive aspirations yet people tend to describe feminism employ negative terms, and feminism today has acquired a bad reputation. Radical and extremists are adjectives commonly applied to feminism as a whole, when, in truth, feminists who hire extreme positions constitute the minority. Moreover, these gender feminists, or militant feminists, as some call them, although they receive the close public attention because of their aggressive tactics and high visibility, alienate people in broadcasting their views. Their goal, to create a sentimental priesthood that will achieve collective power and retribution as oppressed victims of a white-male supremacy, seems un average (Himmelfarb 20). In contrast, equity feminists, or donnish feminists, embrace the basic principles of feminism. They celebrate womens achievements, work for the individual rights of all women, and, as Christina Hoff Sommers aptly says, want for women what they want for everyone, equal protection under the faithfulness (Himmelfarb 20). Though not all feminists agree on how to reach this goal, most argue for a reasonable, realistic, and positive method. By contrasting the differing feminist ideas of writers alike Adrienne Rich, Gertrude Himmelfarb, and Camille Paglia, one defines a winning brand of feminism a philosophy founded on equity feminist ideology and dedicated to the achievement of social, political, economic, and sharp reform. David Thomas and Camille Pag... ...minism by constantly raising the stakes, and seeking not incorrupt reform or revision...but revolution (Himmelfarb 20). In this way, they isolate themselves and lose underpin among both men and women for the entire feminist ca use. John Ellis concludes that gender feminism poisons relations between the sexes, and catapults into leadership roles in the womens movement angry, alienated women who purloin that movement from the necessary task of exploring feasible changes (74). People need to cognise that feminism, based on its essential ideals and goals, has broad appeal, and that they should not dismiss it because of a specific sector. They must look beyond the extremists to find a starting time of feminism that welcomes all people and focuses on a positive and reasonable goal a society that affords everyone the opportunity and right under the integrity to reach his or her potential.